Capitalization of Interest Cost
Project Description: The objective of this project is to reconsider the accounting and financial reporting standards for capitalization of interest cost, with the goal of enhancing the relevance of capital asset information and potentially simplifying financial reporting. In particular, the guidance will be reviewed in light of the definitions of financial statement elements now established in the GASB’s conceptual framework.
Added to Current Agenda: December 2016
- Accounting and Financial Reporting Issues
- Work Plan
- Recent Minutes
- Tentative Board Decisions
- Project staff:
Capitalization of Interest Cost—Project Plan
Paragraph 7 of Statement 62 requires that interest cost that is incurred during the time when a government is bringing a capital asset related to business-type activities to the condition and location necessary for its intended use should be included in the historical cost of the capital asset. Although the Board modified the FASB guidance to be consistent with GASB standards—specifically, excluding capital assets related to governmental activities—the guidance was essentially incorporated into Statement 62 as is, without reexamination.
Concepts Statement No. 4, Elements of Financial Statements, was issued in June 2007. It defines assets as “resources with present service capacity that the government presently controls.” In general, interest cost is reported as an outflow of resources—an expense or expenditure, depending on the basis of accounting. Concepts Statement 4 states, “An outflow of resources is a consumption of net assets by the government that is applicable to the reporting period.” [footnote omitted]
Finally, a stakeholder requested the reexamination of the capitalization of interest guidance as a potential simplification project.
Accounting and Financial Reporting Issues: The project is considering the following issues:
- Should interest cost that is capitalized under existing standards instead be reported as an outflow of resources?
- If capitalization of interest cost were to be retained:
- Should the beginning of capitalization differ depending on whether a borrowing is taxable or tax exempt?
- What are the most suitable criteria for determining when capitalization should begin?
- Added to current technical agenda: December 2016
- Deliberations began: July 2017
Topics to be considered
|August 2017:||Consider appropriateness of existing guidance.|
|September 2017:||Review first draft of the standards section of an Exposure Draft.|
|October 2017:||Review preballot draft of an Exposure Draft.|
|November 2017 (T/C):||Review ballot draft and consider Exposure Draft for issuance.|
|December 2017–January 2018:||Comment period.|
|May 2018:||Review preballot draft of a final Statement.|
|June 2018 (T/C):||Review ballot draft and consider a final Statement for approval.|
Minutes of Teleconference, July 17, 2017
The Board began its deliberations on the Capitalization of Interest Cost project by discussing whether construction-period interest should be (a) capitalized, (b) reported as a deferred outflow of resources, or (c) reported as an outflow of resources. The Board tentatively decided to propose that construction-period interest be reported as an outflow of resources and recognized as an expense/expenditure in the period in which it is incurred.
The Board tentatively decided that construction-period interest cost should be accounted for as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) in the period in which it is incurred.